Compiled by G. Edward Griffin  

If you received this report by e-mail and some graphics are out of alignment,
it is because not all e-mail programs interpret HTML code the same.
To see this report with all graphics correctly placed, click here.


Go to
The Reality Zone

Go to
Freedom Force

Go to
Readers' Comments

Go to
News Archives


Midas Resources Gold Offer 1-800-686-2237


(Click for rates)



Aug 13-15, Oklahoma City Ed Griffin speaks at Freedom 21 Conference on how to stop home-grown tyranny. Details here. Contact Tom DeWeese at 540-341-8911.

Continental Congress 2009.
A national coalition of leaders in the freedom movement will meet to determine a unified action program to restore the American Republic. Date and location to be announced. Contact We the People.

            FREE LISTING
Send us information about upcoming events and we will post it here free. Should be under 35 words. Activities must be consistent with
The Creed of Freedom and The Code of Conduct. Send to

2009 JULY 11 – JULY 17

Click on headlines to see full articles
If original sources are missing, click on Cached.
Star indicates article worth printing for future reference.
Camera indicates video or slideshow.
Speaker indicates audio.
Asterisk indicates an amazing event or phenomenon.
    (See them all together here.)


US: Federal judge rules that FBI does not have to answer question in law suits relating to 9/11 attack. After all these years, the government still is protecting its secrets about that day.
2009 July 16 (Cached)

US: Proposed federal healthcare bill would make individual private insurance illegal. Collectivism does not like free competition.
Freedom Works
2009 July 16 (Cached)

US: Federal judge dismisses soldier's suit challenging legitimacy of Obama's presidency because, a few days ago, his deployment orders to Afghanistan were revoked. Makes no sense but that was the ruling. Ledger Enquirer 2009 July 16 (Cached)

UK: London Times censors mass opposition to mandatory Swine Flu vaccine.
Prison Planet
2009 July 16 (Cached)

US: Harley Davidson cuts 1000 jobs as sales plunge. Economic Times 2009 July 16 (Cached)

US: J.P. Morgan-Chase reports 36% surge in profits after counting it massive taxpayer bailout. It's easy to show a profit when you have access to stolen funds. Washington Post 2009 July 16 (Cached)

US: Hillary Clinton says CFR tells government what it should be doing and how to think about the future. Really! Read the transcript.
State Dept
2009 July 15 (Cached)

Great undercover expose of government health care. Entertaining but pathetically true.
Breitbart 2009 July 15

50 heads of state from developing countries call for New World Order. (Read: global government based on the model of collectivism.) In reality, it's already here. They just want it to be more powerful.
Raw Story 2009 July 15 (Cached)

Maine: Bangor City Councilor Opposes Public Involvement in Local Government. Says voters should not have a direct voice in tax issues. The only thing unusual about her view is that she admits it.
As Maine Goes 2009 July 15 (Cached)

India takes giant step toward New World Order by issuing 1.2 billion national identity cards. If the cards were stacked, they would rise 150 times higher than Mt. Everest. Collectivist heaven.
Times Online
2009 July 15 (Cached)

US: Deployment orders are revoked for soldier who challenged Obama's legitimacy as Commander and Chief. Soldier's attorney sees that as a victory for those seeking proof of where the President was born. No long-form birth certificate has yet been produced. WND 2009 July 14 (Cached)

CBS 60-Minutes program from 1979 exposes the false Swine Flu pandemic scare and the health disasters that followed mass inoculations. Looks like history is about to repeat. This is VERY important.
60 Minutes
Posted 2009 July 11

Philadelphia talk-show host, well known for his endorsement of Creature from Jeckyll Island, suffers fatal heart attack on stage while introducing the book's author, G. Edward Griffin.
Philadelphia Enquirer Posted 2009 July 11 (Cached)

This is what TV ads for anti-depressant drugs SHOULD be like. CCHR Posted 2009 July 11

US: Widely circulated quote by Judge Sotomayer calling for castration of white males is a fake, says Snopes. Here is how it evolved.
Posted 2009 July 11 (Cached)

Chicago has its coolest July 8 in 118 years. This is global warming? Chicago Tribune 2009 July 9 (Cached) Posted last week with bad link. Now correct.

            FROM OUR READERS
Send comments to
Although we are unable to engage in personal correspondence, we deeply appreciate your contribution. Thank you.

Mr. Griffin,
Have you done any research regarding the spiritual nature/root at the heart of so many of the issues we face today? If so, what are your thoughts on the spiritual background concerning the New World Order? I believe based on the evidence that it is Luciferian (the light bearer) in nature. Can you comment on the New World Order, and the New Age (world religion)?
Aaron, 2009 July 17


I see the spiritual component of our global battle to be very important, and I suspect that there is a strong occult connection, although I don't know how one could go about proving that to the satisfaction of skeptics. Even without that, however, I do not think that the resolution of the conflict for freedom lies solely in theology. Advocates of the The New Order want the collectivist state to become the operational equivalent and replacement of all present religions. Loyalty to any other body of ideas is viewed by them as competition to their absolute rule.

Further than that, you may find my comments on the role of religion in our freedom crusade to be of interest: (Click here)
Ed Griffin


Dear Mr. Griffin:
I spent a day or so going through portions of your Freedom Force website. I must say that I am in complete agreement with your insight concerning the use of the name "Protectorate" to describe what our founders had in mind for the nature of our federal "government". I should add in addition that the one concept that appeared in your writing that I regarded as something of a revelation was the notion that a priori corrupt personages would make it their business to invade public office for the plunder that was there available, the reverse causation sequence of Lord Acton's much more widely known "Power Corrupts". I also agree that "Who watches the watchers?" is the key issue. You have created Freedom Force International to accomplish that purpose.
Alan J., 2009 July 16


Mr. Griffin,
I'm currently reading your book, Creature of Jekyll Island. I'm a public high school history/government/economics teacher. I'm considering assigning your book to my honors students next year (Aug. 09).

On page 213 is a photo of Professor Quigley formerly of Georgetown University. It mentions that his book, Tragedy and Hope, was suppressed. I met Professor Quigley in February of 1971 while taking students to Washington, D.C. for a Close Up Foundation meeting with government officials. I went to meet Professor Quigley on a Friday afternoon and found him in his office. We chatted for quite some time. We spoke about his book being suppressed and he showed me letters from librarians saying they could not purchase a copy to replace copies stolen from their library. I was 24 at that time and probably didn't fully understand the implications of this suppression.

On page 230 of your text, you discuss the ultimate obstacle of the cartel is government that doesn't want to finance debt; or incur more. It led me to rethink Eisenhower's warning about the alliance of the military-industrial complex and Jim Garrison's search for the real assassin in Dallas, 1963. The first American troops to be removed from Vietnam took place just a few months earlier.
Great job on this work.
Neil E., 2009 July 16


Dear Ed,
In reading the many & varied comments & views from our fellow members/readers, it is clear that the passion & patriotism they convey is very real. We should all be encouraged by their spirit & enthusiasm and continue to encourage one another. In one short letter Cindy C asked why our friend G. Edward Griffin has not yet been interviewed by any of the talking heads on Fox News. I'm sure many others are asking the same question. This would indeed be the ideal kind of exposure we need to more effectively get the word out to the unsuspecting public. However, because the media (which includes the Fox Network) is owned by the opposition, they are on a short leash. That is to say O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity & others are only allowed to broadcast 'censored' news. At a certain point they are not allowed to cross the line. Notice that when they do get too close to the line, there is little, or no follow up on the issue, or they conveniently launch into in commercial break. For example in one Beck episode he said; " the Federal Reserve was not Federal", but there was little, or no effective follow up later!

Since Fox favors the Republican wing, may I suggest the following: Lou Dobbs claims to be an Independent. Independents tend to want facts & solutions to our nations woes and they number close to one third of the voters, should they ever choose to vote. If as many serious minded Freedom Force members as possible were to write to Lou Dobbs about getting Mr. Griffin on his Network, there is a good chance that some of these letters would get through the Network screening process and reach Lou. Perhaps this suggestion may seem somewhat unorthodox, but it is sometimes ' thinking outside the box ' that gets results!
Stan B., 2009 July 16

On Wednesday, July 15, I was interviewed on the Fox channel by Judge Andrew Napolitano and was about ten minutes to tell it like it really is regarding the Fed. Napolitano was receptive and seemed to be in strong agreement. It remains to be seen, of course, if the program producers will schedule follow up interviews.


Hi Ed,
Interested in your judgment as to the level of understanding of the public (and of your audience, assuming it is more knowledgeable) as to the coming pandemic (as it is called). How many know that this is a man-made and man-implemented disease, intended to cause genocide? How many know (or suspect) that the vaccines are intended to spread the pandemic and will be the root cause of the severity of the resultant flu? ... and that they are to be avoided at all costs, as they are dangerous and death-dealing?

When I hear from you, I'll give you my feelings,
Dave L., 2009 July 15


Hello Dave.
It appears that you already have succinctly expressed your feelings. My opinion is that subscribers to Unfiltered News and members of Freedom Force are well aware of the political motivations behind the Swine Flu so-called pandemic and are very suspicious about the vaccine becoming a carrier or aggravator of the disease. The general public, however, hasn’t a clue. They still are living in the “all-is-what-it-seems” twilight zone.
Ed Griffin


We had about 3000 Patriots attend out July 4th event in Peachtree City, GA. I copied over 250 of your CD’s “The Creature from Jekyll Island” and handed out as people signed our petition. We also had petition tables to audit the Federal Reserve, a petition to stop Obama’s Health Care, and a petition to stop Cap and Trade. Thank you for this idea of yours to share and educate the public about the “real” agenda of the so-called Federal Reserve. Blessings to you!!
Gayle Braun, 2009 July 14


Dear Mr. Griffin,
Ever since reading your treatise on the Federal Reserve, I have been so moved that I have purchased over a dozen copies to share with friends. After pointing out the original date of publication, I have suggested to all of my friends that they start reading their books at Chapter 24 (which could easily have been culled from the pages of 2008 editions of the Wall Street Journal) and then go back and start at the beginning to see how we got here.

Anyhow, because of the insights that I've gleaned from your research and writing, I have developed a keen eye for stories that demonstrate evidence of the further progression towards the goals of the elite. So, imagine my surprise when I read the story today about a Federal program that could be described as a significant step towards the nationalization of the housing industry and the gradual elimination of personal property. And the amazing thing is that it is positioned as a convenient way for "troubled homeowners" to "save their homes" from foreclosure! This is the one prediction that you had made which I really had some trouble envisioning! So, your prognostications continue to amaze me.

Thank you and God bless you for your contributions to my knowledge and awareness.
John B, 2009 July 14


I really found this to be a fascinating read. I just have one thing I'm curious about though, why did you not go into the topic of "The Militia of The Several States"? The true constitutional militia. It would lower taxes dramatically because "We The People" would be the ones taking care of most of the basic functions that people are paid to do as government employee's.

We would need no FEMA or similar high dollar organizations. We would not have to worry about disarmament or confiscation of property because we ourselves would be the protectorate. We would be more informed on things going on because we would be more involved, ballots could be counted and double counted by the militia. Every home with an able bodied male would be able to vote more effectively. Due to the difference in needs, technology, population, etc. of historical U.S. militias, not everyone would constantly be busy working with the militia so, things in our day to day engagements would be normal. They would be similar to the reserves in the sense that they would go for training periodically. When under emergency alarm then all would muster. Just as traditional gun control would have it everyone would be required to have their own firearm to have at home as well as other pertinent tools to the individuals functions in the militia, And much much much more. Thank you for you time as always.
Chuan Bo, 2009July 14


Comment by G. Edward Griffin, 2009 July 13
Last week I published an analysis of Statism Is Dead, a video advocating a form of anarchy called Anarcho Capitalism as a desirable alternative for government. In my response I offered an entirely new alternative called a protectorate, a political structure in which the state would be prohibited from doing anything except to protect the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens.

When this concept was first presented to a Libertarian friend, he objected that, as long as the state has the authority to use coercion against people, it is still a government, even though it may be restricted to a defensive role. He wrote: "A government is a government. Even 'anarcho-capitalist Protection Agencies' are governments! ... If they are to pursue justice, they are still obliged to initiate force against suspects, even if they aren't clients."

My friend was focused on the old vocabulary and had not yet opened his mind to the possibility of a genuine new entry into the political lexicon. What I am presenting is not just a re-hash of the old concept in which talk about "limited government" is expressed in terms of quantity (how much government), instead of purpose (what shall government do). With the old concept, he would be right: government is government. A lot or a little, it always suffers from mission creep and will eventually become tyrannical. However, if it is limited to a negative, defensive function, then there is little room for mission creep because there is no possibility for legalized plunder, which is the primary incentive for expanding government in the first place.

An aircraft with no wings or tail, that cannot fly but is limited solely to ground travel is not an aircraft any longer. It is an automobile. If a truck is deprived of its steering ability, and its rubber tires are replaced by steel flanges that run on rails, it is no longer a truck. It is a train. Likewise, a state that has been deprived of its authority to use coercion for any purpose except the protection the life, liberty, and property of its citizens, cannot be classified as a government. It is a protectorate.

If we and our neighbors hire a security guard to patrol our neighborhood, and if we authorize him to use force against intruders for the restricted purpose of protecting our lives, liberty, and property (each of us has that right of self defense, so we can delegate it to the guard), that does not give him the authority to govern us - with the obvious narrow exception of insuring that we, ourselves, do not threaten our neighbors. When our contract with guards or state administrators is strictly for our defense, we do not create a government. It is a protectorate.

This is not a new concept in political literature but, in this context, it is a new word. It is far overdue because, without it, it has been impossible to even talk about the negative concept of the state without resorting to long and cumbersome sentences of explanation. At last we have the right word.

If you would like to see the original analysis, updated with this additional comment, click here.


Hello, Mr. Griffin.
I so enjoyed your speech at Eastern University. Once again, it is because of you that I am involved in the Freedom Movement and threw my hat in the political ring. I can't thank you enough for educating me. And you're correct in that the missing piece to the puzzle is that we need to get involved ourselves: "An Idea Whose Time Has Come."

I spoke with you a little about my being elected to the Republican Party State Committee and what we (Rob Eichmann, Jr. and I) have been trying to do in New Jersey. We represent the Republican Party from Gloucester County. ... Rob and I feel that the Republican Party in New Jersey has lost its identity, and many of the candidates endorsed by the Republican Party are no different than democrats. I understand the reason for having identical, yet what appears to be different, political parties ("Tragedy and Hope" written by Professor Carroll Quigley). Here is a chance for two of us to help make a difference in our state.

What is happening in the moderate State of New Jersey is that followers of Robert Welch, G Edward Griffin and Ron Paul are making inroads in the political arena. I suspect it will get ugly for awhile, and then we can "get back to our roots" and once again follow the U.S. Constitution. That is what I hope will happen in New Jersey. I am sending this information to you because I thought you may be interested in what is taking place in New Jersey politics.

Besides Rob Eichmann, Jr. and I being elected to a four-year term as State Committee members, we also have a candidate for sheriff and a candidate for County Freeholder, and I am again a candidate for Township Committee. The information you share with us is having a ripple effect. I thought you might get a kick out of hearing how you have affected some of us and how we are helping to implement change in our small part of the world.

Thank you again, Mr. Griffin, for your words of wisdom and guidance. .
Donna Ward, 2009 July 12


I have come to the conclusion the the Court is second only to Congress in the number of lies told to the people of The United States and second to none in the destruction of this great Republic. As anyone who has spent any time at all in a study of the Constitution knows, this so-called decision is an absolute contradiction of the Constitution, not to mention a repudiation of the Declaration of Independence.

Mr G, the frustration you have had to deal with trying to get the truth out must at times be almost too much to bear.
William V Wood Tsgt USAF (Ret), 2009 July 11



Mr. Peterson,
On the same newsletter, in which you responded to me, a gentlemen by the name of "Stan" wrote a comment that the "Owner of Fox News is member of CFR/Trilateral Commission." Here is what he wrote in dicta:

"Opinions are usually based on observation and shared observations with like minded people usually tend to lend more credibility to the issues in question. Facts are another matter. First, we need to establish what facts pertaining to what issues. Then, where can these facts be found? And how do we gain access to these facts? Further questions arise as to the credibility & source of these facts, who documented & compiled the data? How can they be satisfactorily verified? One can easily begin to understand that providing PROOF about the status & background of any given personality is a daunting task."

Obviously I am not the only one thinking like this. So too does Stan. Your response shows nothing factual, other than reaching hyped-up personal conclusions that are just opinions. Why can you not "establish what [are the] facts?". Your ad hominem attacks saying that I am "delusion" and that I have "embarassed" myself are just an unfair way of you, not answering the challenge. You then say that I would "believe corporate media actors to deliver" me news. I do submit to you that, by personally being subscribed to the Unfiltered News, do you really have the nerve to say that?

Offer me something from a primary source that shows that Glenn Beck is what you claim him to be, rather than offering me what your brain antenna recept. This is what needs to change in this movement! Establish facts and not offer more opinions, which is something we have enough of in this movement. Just because he cried once on his show - is irrebutable proof that he is part of an operative group? That's just hogwash!

I am not ignoring reality here, I am just questioning your observations. I certainly do not question your sincerity, but I am just trying to show you, as well as others, a growing cancer that needs to be fixed within this movement and that is FACT CHECKING. And finally, going to your poor example of Michael Jackson. I am no fan of Michael Jackson, but to give you a legal answer, he was acquited by a jury of his peers, when his "lunacy" was placed on trial before a jury.

Who knows - now that I a disagree with you, I too, would be labeled a CIA operative in your mind, merely because I disagree and challenge your questionable conclusion.
Respectfully yours,
Kemal Kurtulus, 2009 July 11



I don't know what this discussion is about, and I agree with you 1000% that personal opinions mean little. But, I would like to offer the following about Glenn Beck.

I attended the OKC Tea Party on 4-15. That afternoon, I started back home and my route was east on I-40. I was about an hour out from Ft.
Smith, AR, and was channel surfing on the radio looking for a talk show, when I found a station with a Beck program. I heard him say on that day as follows: that the CFR and Tri-Lat Comm were only concerned for the well-being of the American people, were friends of the American people, and only wanted to help improve their lives. Based on what I have learned about these organizations, what Beck said was false. I now consider Beck to be in the enemy's camp.

I only know what I heard. I cannot produce that radio program, and proving what I heard can only come from Beck's lips if he says it again, and perhaps writes such in a letter. But, I am no fan of Beck, and believe he has another agenda.
Larry Becraft, 2009 July 11


Ed Griffin meets Stefan Molyneux in this wonderful dialogue; I am very glad that these issues are being brought up to the Freedom Force
membership [and readers of Unfiltered News]. Here are some questions that remain unanswered:

Is a man's right in his property truly, incontrovertibly, an inalienable

If some elites succeed in forming a political government that claims
sovereignty over my property, against my wishes, and issues rules in
conflict with my own rules, whose rules take precedence? Would the
proposed "protectorate" leave me alone if I asserted sovereignty over my own property and ignored the various rules it emits and fees it levies?

Furthermore, I am told that my final recourse to rejecting the
legitimate sovereignty of an organization that would murder me if I
resist its robbery is to leave my homestead behind and find another
place to live. (Even the proposed "protectorate" would have to be
tax-funded, if it is to be a monopoly provider of political liberty in
the sense of "limited government".)

Assume that I were to resign myself to this apparent contradiction to
the notion of inalienable property rights -- though it is unclear why
"keeping my property" and "being left alone" must be mutually exclusive.

Then what if there is nowhere more free for me to go? What if every
other State has closed its borders to people like me -- for example,
through international agreements not to harbor "tax evaders" or
"political protestors"?

Why should my only options be to "find the door" -- assuming a way out still remains -- or to "stay and fight", with the inescapable
consequences of taking on an entire gang dedicated to preserving the
appearance of omnipotence?

Isn't there a third option: that the legitimacy of government, or of any
other association, is fundamentally defined by whether it is required to
leave alone those who object to it?

This idea of a "protectorate" is not a new idea at all as long as I am
forced to pay it and forced to accept its services on its terms if I
want to keep my property. These two seemingly innocuous powers are all any government needs to grow from the smallest "protectorate" seed to the most totalitarian "empire".

Paper constitutions have the same long-term value as paper money; also, like paper money, they lend a false sense of security to the holder. What constitution has ever kept the government from rewriting or discarding it throughout history? Just look at Latin America and Europe: one could make a bonfire with the constitutions they have gone through in the last 500 years. Every communist regime in Africa shrouds itself both with monetary and with constitutional paper.

But the heart of the matter is this: Concentrated power that legalizes
robbery to fund itself will always win in the end. It always wins
because the State steals from those who work, so that State-connected interests do not need to work to put food on the table, and can thus occupy their days working to consolidate their power. The consolidated power is eventually turned on those whom the original, limited power was intended to serve. And because the victims have to work for a living, they do not have the means of fighting back.

We know that this power cartel won't let anything as quaint as a set of written rules stand in its way. So do we really want to be advocating aiding and abetting something that will become the worst nightmare of generations down the road?

Imagine how the Founders, with the exception of Alexander Hamilton, would react if they were to observe what their little experiment mutated into, despite the efforts of probably the finest team of governmental engineers in history. Had they foreseen what would become of the U.S. government, I believe the convention in Philadelphia would have been called off.

We are enlightened beyond any generation that came before. Let's use our unique perspective to try new ways of doing things, instead of
staying on the same old treadmill. Disagree? Fine. I just hope you'll
leave me alone to do things my way on my own property; that's all I ask.

Is that "anarchy"? I believe it is nothing more than the most
fundamental of all liberties: the right to freely disassociate.
Ryan, 2009 July 11


A rather whimsical ruling by the Supreme Court; nothing in the Constitution prohibits any state, or group of states, from exiting the union, which was a critical issue for Abraham Lincoln. ... The federal government was not given the power in the Constitution to retain states which wish to leave, but the ability for states to leave, if they wish, is at least implied by the Tenth Amendment; while I've not read the brief as yet, my money says that Texas did not rely upon the Tenth Amendment in its secession. The forced retention of secessionist states by force or decree is ludicrous, since compelled loyalty is a false loyalty upon its face.
Ken Case, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2009 July 11


Dear Ed,
I appreciate all the alternative news you present in your 'Reality Zone' e-zine. Although I don't subscribe to any of the mass propaganda resources, this is the only news I read regularly. I read the Brown's conviction article with interest. There are a number of points in the article that are notable:

1. The Browns live in NH, the only state where there didn't used to be gun regulations. Yet, they had their 2nd Amendment guarantees entirely violated by an 'out of control' federal government, assisted by the COUNTY SHERIFF (who was traditionally supposed to be 'the law of the land', as well as their last line of defense against government corruption).

2. The sneaky tactics utilized by the federal government to 'peacefully' take them into custody were reprehensible. I suppose they would have lost their aura of legitimacy had they initiated another Waco.

3. They had no organized help from their neighbors: "United we stand, divided we fall".

4. The federal prosecutor debased them in the media with a post-trial comment to the effect that the feds were 'upholding the rule of law'. Had the feds been doing such, they would never have approached the Browns for anything, whether tax-related or firearms-related. Does the news ever present the BILLIONS of $ of ANNUALLY UNPAID tax revenues that their own people NEVER pay, but are LEGALLY REQUIRED to pay? We do not, b/c these 'public spectacles' are designed by the police state to intimidate the people and control them through their minds by fear, while keeping them ignorant and divided. The feds were clearly in violation of THEIR OWN tax laws and THEIR OWN OATHS OF OFFICE regarding the 2nd Amendment. So were all the other 'legal officials' involved in this travesty of 'law and order'. How can that be right?

5. All of the news articles about the Browns have been severely biased in favor of the federal tyranny, presenting the feds as being legitimate and 'law-upholding'; when in fact the federal tyranny is LAWLESS. They break the letter of the law and violate our rights B/C THEY CAN, not b/c it's right. WHO is there to hold them to account for all their policy-driven lawlessness? Surely not a divided American public. I have personal knowledge of the facts on how brainwashed the federal employees and officers are. I wonder why they aren't held to the same standards of 'knowledge' and 'behavior' as the courts hold 'the people' to?

6. I attempted to contact the author of the article (David Tirrell-Wysocki), but have been unable to find any contact information on the internet. It seems good to me to contact the journalist who wrote the article, and then question them directly, instead of leaving comments in an online blog. I wish to inquire why they ALWAYS presnt PARTIAL facts in a BIASED manner, without ANY regard for the LAW and the RIGHTS of the people. Instead, they spin government allegiance instead of allegiance to GOD, the Creator of all our rights and of law and order. I wonder why I can hardly ever contact these writers; and when I do, they ALWAYS refuse to answer the 'hard questions'?

Thanks again for spreading around alternative news, much of which would never make the main media channels.
Chris Huminski, 2009 July 11


Aloha Mr. Griffin,
I appreciate your newsletter and especially your thoughtful commentary. I write to you today in response to John Ferguson's response to your critique of Stefan Molyneux's Statism is Dead video series.

I would encourage Mr. Ferguson to continue studying these issues and would highly recommend the philosophers mentioned in this article on the social contract:

To give a complete response would likely take hours to complete and so I intend here to cover the basics. So my focus will only on the question of whether or not Mr. Ferguson signed a "Social Contract." I would contend that he did and is not even aware of it.

I would like to ask Mr. Ferguson a few questions:
Does he have a Social Security Card?
Does he have any bank accounts, credit cards, mortgages, etc.?
Does he have a State issued Driver's License? Registration?
Does he maintain any professional licenses with his state?
Does he have a voter registration filed in his state?
Does he use Federal Reserve Notes in the conduct of his trade or business?
Is he a United States Citizen?

This last one is a "gimme"... if he has answered yes to the other questions he is a de-facto citizen of the United States. If Mr. Ferguson, or anyone else, for that matter, has answered "yes" to each of these questions than he has signed the Social Contract with the United States Government.
Mike Flaherty, 2009 July 11


                Being informed is not enough.
               Freedom Force awaits you here.
               Freedom Force

by G. Edward Griffin
Where does money come from? Where does it go? Who makes it? The money magician's secrets are unveiled. Here is a close look at their mirrors and smoke machines, the pulleys, cogs, and wheels that create the grand illusion called money. A boring subject? Just wait. You'll be hooked in five minutes. It reads like a detective story – which it really is, but it's all true. This book is about the most blatant scam of history. (More)

The Richardson Cancer Clinic Experience
by J.A. Richardson & Patricia Griffin.
62 case histories proving beyond any doubt that Laetrile (Vitamin B17) works in the control of cancer. These are not anecdotal stories or cases of people who never had cancer in the first place. Each history is authenticated by a firm diagnosis and meticulous medical documentation.

This edition includes a follow up 30 years after the patients were diagnosed with incurable cancer. Proof is in the actual life-span of these people who, previously, had been told by their doctors that they had just a few months or weeks to live.

Europe & U.S. indexes, today

S&P 500, 5 yrs. Click for price.
Click here to visit!

GOLD, 5 yrs. Click for price.
Click here to visit!

SILVER, 5 yrs. Click for price.
Click here to visit!

The Story of Vitamin B17

by G. Edward Griffin.
Mr. Griffin marshals the evidence that cancer is a deficiency disease—like scurvy or pellagra—aggravated by the lack of an essential food compound in modern man’s diet. That substance is vitamin B17. In its purified form developed for cancer therapy, it is known as Laetrile. This story is not approved by orthodox medicine. The FDA, the AMA, and The American Cancer Society have labeled it fraud and quackery. Yet the evidence is clear that here, at last, is the final answer to the cancer riddle. Why has orthodox medicine waged war against this non drug approach? The author contends that the answer is to be found, not in science, but in politics—and is based upon the hidden economic and power agenda of those who dominate the medical establishment. This is is the most complete and authoritative treatise available on this topic. (More)

MAKING A KILLING: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging
This documentary exposes how psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry have invented so-called mental diseases that are merely conditions of normal human experience – such as shyness or anxiety. Their goal is to convince everyone they have a mental condition that must be managed by prescription drugs. This marketing ploy has led half the population into dependency on medications for the rest of their lives. People are harmed more than helped, and these drugs kill an estimated 42,000 people every year. Learn how to protect your family from this brutal money-making machine. (More)

GENERATION RX; Children As Victims of Anti-Depressant Drugs
Follows the trail of dishonest advertising, falsified research, deceived doctors, corrupt corporate executives, distraught parents, and drugged children – a trail that leads to a wave of youth aggression and suicides. Millions of young people have been falsely diagnosed as having a brain chemical imbalance and given anti-depressant drugs that are destroying their minds. Even the most informed person will be shocked by the facts and testimony in this documentary. The human race depends on exposing and then stopping this pseudo-science of death. (More)


This tells how the U. N., from 1960 to 1962, waged an unprovoked war against the peaceful state of Katanga and forced it under the Communist state of the Central Congo. Top U.N. personnel boasted in their public speeches and memoirs of how they pretended to be preserving law and order while actually carrying out a military operation to crush the tiny nation, all in the name of peace. We have not seen the last of U.N. so-called peace-keeping forces. Unless the further development of what is called the New World Order can be stopped, we are going to see a U.N. army used more and more to bring its peculiar brand of peace to the world. The best way to envision the future is to know the past. Black-and-white. 1991 introduction by
G. Edward Griffin. Originally released as a VHS tape, this program has been re-mastered in DVD format. (More)

This New York Times Best Seller is a data mine of scientific facts showing that global warming is not caused by human activity but by solar activity and cosmic radiation – and the cycle has been occurring for millions of years. The recent rise in temperature has created the most ideal climate for civilization that Earth has ever experienced. The next cycle will be colder and much less beneficial for mankind. (More)

First broadcast over Great Britain’s public service TV station, this documentary deconstructs the myth that Global Warming is caused by human activity. World-class scientists explain that it is caused by solar activity, and that similar cycles have occurred many times in history. Solar activity recently was high, so higher temperatures are the expected result. In previous years, when industrialization was increasing at its greatest rate, temperatures went down. (More)

A Discourse by G. Edward Griffin

The author of The Creature from Jekyll Island; A Second Look at the Federal Reserve adresses such issues as: Who created the Fed? How is money created?
What impact has this had on the American Dollar? Should our currency be backed by gold or silver? Where does government get most of its funding? Why do bankers get away with it? What might happen if we continue on our current path? What might come from a return to constitutional money? (More)

This is a history of theories and experiments regarding antigravity travel. It is a virtual encyclopedia of data, blueprints, and photographs. Includes information on electrogravitic effects now used in advanced military craft, such as the B-2 bomber, and in missiles. Everyone with an interest in the science of harnessing gravity should have this book for the sheer enjoyment of the unfolding story and as a serious reference volume. (More)

A Discourse on Government by
G. Edward Griffin
“Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire, a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” – George Washington
G. Edward Griffin responds to questions from a camera crew creating a video documentary on the U.S. Constitution. He answers the most difficult questions imaginable in the fields of political and social science. The depth and clarity is amazing, especially considering he is speaking

without script or notes. In an era when many people are just now waking up to the WHAT of current events, here are issues for the brain that go far beyond that shallow pool into the deep water of WHY and HOW. (More)

The Testimony of Yuri Bezmenov, KGB Propagandist

Yuri Bezmenov, the son of a high-ranking Soviet officer, was a member of the elite propaganda arm of the KGB, known as the Novasti Press Agency. One of his assignments was to accompany journalists visiting the Soviet Union to make sure they did not discover the truth about Soviet life. After becoming disillusioned with the oppressive system, he escaped to the West at great risk to his life. In this interview, conducted by G. Edward Griffin, Mr. Bezmenov tells how the Soviets used propaganda against their own citizens; how he hoodwinked American journalists into publishing Soviet propaganda, how slave laborers are concealed from foreign visitors, and how he escaped to the West posing as an American hippie. Includes many photographs brought with him on microfilm at the time of his escape.
Part 1: Life under Soviet Collectivism
Part 2: Propaganda and Mind Control
Part 3: Cultural Subversion and Escape

A Temptation for Electronic Vote
Fraud.   Governments are installing computerized voting systems with no paper record to verify accuracy. Elections will be controlled by companies that do not allow voters to inspect their software. If vote counting becomes privatized, there may be no way to get it back. High-tech vote fraud is already a reality. If you value your vote, you absolutely must get this information to your friends – and fast! (More)

Here is scientific proof that: the Earth often has been hotter than it is now; only a tiny portion of green-house gases are man-made; most of Antarctica now is getting colder; the media only recently abandoned the global "cooling” scare; and more. These facts counter the global-warming junk science that is scaring people into meekly accepting more government. (More)

The Persecution of Falun Gong
The Testimony of Charles Lee
Dr. Charles Lee is one of the few political prisoners held in Chinese prisons who has survived to tell about it. After receiving a medical degree in China, he came to the U.S. in 1991 for graduate study and soon thereafter became an American citizen. In 2003 he returned to China to proclaim the truth about government persecution of Falun Gong, a non-violent, spiritual movement dedicated to “Truthfulness, Compassion and Forbearance”. He was arrested and sentenced to 3 years in prison where he was beaten, force-fed, and tortured, which he describes in gruesome detail in this video interview by G. Edward Griffin. On January 21, 2006, Charles was released and returned to San Francisco. Now he is a leader in the movement that has motivated millions of members of the Chinese Communist Party to resign. (More)

FIAT EMPIRE; The Federal Reserve vs. The Constitution
This documentary shows how the Federal Reserve creates inflation, destabilizes the economy, causes wars, and enriches financial elitists at the expense of the common man. You will learn that the Fed is not a government agency but a banking cartel, and you will understand why many Americans view it as a sophisticated form of organized crime. (More)

Clicking on any of the
following categories
will take you to the

Reality Zone

Whole Catalog
An alphabetical listing and brief description of all items in our catalog.

Newest Arrivals
New items from all categories, of special interest to returning customers.

Freedom Issues
Books and recordings on the war against freedom, privacy, and sovereignty. 

Health Issues
Books and recordings on medical fraud & natural health (without drugs).
Money & Banking
How to protect yourself from the economic & political power of corrupt banks.

General Interest
Books and recordings on many other interesting topics

Best Sellers
from all categories are listed here in the order of popularity.

Audio Archives
Dynamic CDs on freedom, monetary, and health issues, and true-life adventures.

& Closeouts
Rock-bottom prices and special offers.